There is no denying that whether college students should study a second language as basic science or not has become a controversial topic. From my point of view, I reckon that both advantages and disadvantages exist when a second language is regarded as a fundamental curriculum.
Initially, the reason why I recommend that students are supposed to take the language course same as math, chemistry and physics, etc. is that not only can they gain more employment opportunities, but also extend the scope of knowledge, which indicates that learning a second language enables students to get acquainted with variety of exotic culture, traditions as well as customs, which serves as a function to enlarge their vision of knowledge, meanwhile, majority of companies, nowadays, pose higher standard and requirement to new employees, not only focusing on diplomas, but also individuals abilities, thus it contributes to the increase of employment opportunities by mastering another foreign language. For example, I was in an interview for a part time job, whereas candidates were required with computer and language skills, which led me to the failure in the end. Consequently, it undoubtedly leads students to acquire variety of benefits in a wide range of aspects.
On the contrary, something is never without its drawbacks. Learning a second language usually poses confusion to newcomers in their familiar domains, thus beginners probably suffer stress on account of the negative impacts on existing courses. Besides, never have bilinguals got rid of the threat posed by the cultural invasion. For example, Christmas, nowadays, is increasingly popular among Chinese youngsters, even surpassing any other traditional festival such as the Mid-autumn festival, thus the preservation of domestic tradition is likely to be phased out.
From what has discussed above, we can safely draw the conclusion that whether language course should be added in curriculum as basic science still demands further discussion.
无可否认,大学生是否应该学习第二语言作为基本的科学与否已成为一个有争议的话题。从我的观点来看,我认为这两个优点和缺点存在,当第二语言被认为是一个基本课程。
最初,原因我建议学生应该参加语言课程与数学,化学,物理,等等,他们不仅可以获得更多的就业机会,而且还扩展了知识的范围,这说明学习第二语言使学生熟悉各种外来文化、传统和习俗,作为一个函数来扩大他们的知识,与此同时,大多数的公司,如今,对新员工造成更高的标准和要求,不仅注重文凭,而且个人能力,因此它有助于增加就业机会的掌握一门外语。例如,我是一个兼职工作,在一次采访中,而候选人被要求与计算机和语言技能,最终导致我失败。因此,这无疑使学生获得各种好处在范围广泛的方面。
相反,一些从来都不是没有缺点。学习第二语言通常造成混乱新人在自己熟悉的领域,因此,初学者可能遭受压力的负面影响在现有的课程。除此之外,从来没有双语者摆脱文化入侵的威胁。例如,圣诞节,如今,越来越受中国年轻人的欢迎,甚至超过了其他传统节日,比如中秋节,因此国内传统的保护可能会被淘汰。
通过以上讨论,我们可以得出的结论是,语言课程是否应该添加在基础科学课程仍需要进一步讨论
Initially, the reason why I recommend that students are supposed to take the language course same as math, chemistry and physics, etc. is that not only can they gain more employment opportunities, but also extend the scope of knowledge, which indicates that learning a second language enables students to get acquainted with variety of exotic culture, traditions as well as customs, which serves as a function to enlarge their vision of knowledge, meanwhile, majority of companies, nowadays, pose higher standard and requirement to new employees, not only focusing on diplomas, but also individuals abilities, thus it contributes to the increase of employment opportunities by mastering another foreign language. For example, I was in an interview for a part time job, whereas candidates were required with computer and language skills, which led me to the failure in the end. Consequently, it undoubtedly leads students to acquire variety of benefits in a wide range of aspects.
On the contrary, something is never without its drawbacks. Learning a second language usually poses confusion to newcomers in their familiar domains, thus beginners probably suffer stress on account of the negative impacts on existing courses. Besides, never have bilinguals got rid of the threat posed by the cultural invasion. For example, Christmas, nowadays, is increasingly popular among Chinese youngsters, even surpassing any other traditional festival such as the Mid-autumn festival, thus the preservation of domestic tradition is likely to be phased out.
From what has discussed above, we can safely draw the conclusion that whether language course should be added in curriculum as basic science still demands further discussion.
无可否认,大学生是否应该学习第二语言作为基本的科学与否已成为一个有争议的话题。从我的观点来看,我认为这两个优点和缺点存在,当第二语言被认为是一个基本课程。
最初,原因我建议学生应该参加语言课程与数学,化学,物理,等等,他们不仅可以获得更多的就业机会,而且还扩展了知识的范围,这说明学习第二语言使学生熟悉各种外来文化、传统和习俗,作为一个函数来扩大他们的知识,与此同时,大多数的公司,如今,对新员工造成更高的标准和要求,不仅注重文凭,而且个人能力,因此它有助于增加就业机会的掌握一门外语。例如,我是一个兼职工作,在一次采访中,而候选人被要求与计算机和语言技能,最终导致我失败。因此,这无疑使学生获得各种好处在范围广泛的方面。
相反,一些从来都不是没有缺点。学习第二语言通常造成混乱新人在自己熟悉的领域,因此,初学者可能遭受压力的负面影响在现有的课程。除此之外,从来没有双语者摆脱文化入侵的威胁。例如,圣诞节,如今,越来越受中国年轻人的欢迎,甚至超过了其他传统节日,比如中秋节,因此国内传统的保护可能会被淘汰。
通过以上讨论,我们可以得出的结论是,语言课程是否应该添加在基础科学课程仍需要进一步讨论
BiBIli
