山东大学哲学与社会发展学院
学术预告 当前位置: 首页 > 学术研究 > 学术预告 > 正文
思想力论坛第31期：实际与假设的作者——假设意向性的两个版本之争
发布人 ： 供稿人： 发布日期：2020-11-19 点击：147次
一、报告题目
Actual vs. Hypothetical Authors: The Debate between Two Versions of Hypothetical Intentionalism
二、主讲人与主持人
主持人：苏庆辉
报告人：林斯谚
三、报告时间
11月18日19：00-21：00
四、报告地点
山东大学中心校区知新楼A座1618
五、主讲人简介
林斯谚，男，台湾文化大学哲学系助理教授，新西兰奥克兰大学哲学博士，研究方向：美学、艺术哲学（分析美学进路）；已在国外学术期刊发表论文数篇，包含Journal of Aesthetic Education,Southern Journal of Philosophy,Journal of Literary Theory,Journal of Aesthetics & Culture，另外也出版了数本推理小说。
六、内容简介
Hypothetical intentionalism is the view that the meaning of a work is determined by the ideal audience’s best hypothesis about the author’s intention; a second version holds that interpretation should be guided by a postulated author made out from the work by the audience. In this paper, I deal with the local debate between these two versions of hypothetical intentionalism, arguing that the postulated author account is more convincing than the actual author account. To demonstrate, I conduct a case study and use the Spanish film Open Your Eyes as a counterexample to the actual author account and show that in this case the interpretation reached by the postulated author account is more acceptable. After that, I consider a possible objection to my argument.
思想力论坛第31期：实际与假设的作者——假设意向性的两个版本之争-山东大学哲学与社会发展学院 https://www.sps.sdu.edu.cn/info/1022/3552.htm
学术预告 当前位置: 首页 > 学术研究 > 学术预告 > 正文
思想力论坛第31期：实际与假设的作者——假设意向性的两个版本之争
发布人 ： 供稿人： 发布日期：2020-11-19 点击：147次
一、报告题目
Actual vs. Hypothetical Authors: The Debate between Two Versions of Hypothetical Intentionalism
二、主讲人与主持人
主持人：苏庆辉
报告人：林斯谚
三、报告时间
11月18日19：00-21：00
四、报告地点
山东大学中心校区知新楼A座1618
五、主讲人简介
林斯谚，男，台湾文化大学哲学系助理教授，新西兰奥克兰大学哲学博士，研究方向：美学、艺术哲学（分析美学进路）；已在国外学术期刊发表论文数篇，包含Journal of Aesthetic Education,Southern Journal of Philosophy,Journal of Literary Theory,Journal of Aesthetics & Culture，另外也出版了数本推理小说。
六、内容简介
Hypothetical intentionalism is the view that the meaning of a work is determined by the ideal audience’s best hypothesis about the author’s intention; a second version holds that interpretation should be guided by a postulated author made out from the work by the audience. In this paper, I deal with the local debate between these two versions of hypothetical intentionalism, arguing that the postulated author account is more convincing than the actual author account. To demonstrate, I conduct a case study and use the Spanish film Open Your Eyes as a counterexample to the actual author account and show that in this case the interpretation reached by the postulated author account is more acceptable. After that, I consider a possible objection to my argument.
思想力论坛第31期：实际与假设的作者——假设意向性的两个版本之争-山东大学哲学与社会发展学院 https://www.sps.sdu.edu.cn/info/1022/3552.htm
