我很少谈论词汇量。虽然词汇对于学习英语是必须的,但词汇量的多少并不足以反映英语水平 —— 英语里有所谓的 necessary but insufficient condition。
然而,这里有许多人喜欢进行各种词汇量测试,告诉别人自己的词汇量有多大(或者少)。更甚者,有人喜欢引用一些不知来源的所谓“网上”资料,充当“专家”夸夸其谈,但当中的概念模糊,数据的真确性存疑,结论更像是信口雌黄。
修读语言学的朋友应该听过 Paul Nation 这个名字。Paul 是著名的语言学家,特别在教学法方面有研究。1990年他写的 Teaching & Learning Vocabulary 出版,页12有以下的图表,显示之前有人做研究,得出不同年龄的母语人士平均有多大的词汇量。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fca5/7fca56a7fa285a07b0322508803fb535937f082c" alt=""
Paul 补充道:Recent research ... suggests that estimates of 20,000 words for undergraduates are mostly likely to be correct. This suggests that the first language learners add between 1,000 to 2,000 words per year to their vocabulary. (p.11)
另外一位有名的英语教学法学者 Scott Thornbury 写了一本 How to Teach Vocabulary(2002年出版),同样说母语人士平均词汇量是 20,000:An educated native speaker will probably have a vocabulary of around 20,000 words (or, more accurately, 20,000 word families ...). This is the result of adding a thousand words a year to the 5,000 words he or she had acquired by the age of five.
然而,这里有许多人喜欢进行各种词汇量测试,告诉别人自己的词汇量有多大(或者少)。更甚者,有人喜欢引用一些不知来源的所谓“网上”资料,充当“专家”夸夸其谈,但当中的概念模糊,数据的真确性存疑,结论更像是信口雌黄。
修读语言学的朋友应该听过 Paul Nation 这个名字。Paul 是著名的语言学家,特别在教学法方面有研究。1990年他写的 Teaching & Learning Vocabulary 出版,页12有以下的图表,显示之前有人做研究,得出不同年龄的母语人士平均有多大的词汇量。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fca5/7fca56a7fa285a07b0322508803fb535937f082c" alt=""
Paul 补充道:Recent research ... suggests that estimates of 20,000 words for undergraduates are mostly likely to be correct. This suggests that the first language learners add between 1,000 to 2,000 words per year to their vocabulary. (p.11)
另外一位有名的英语教学法学者 Scott Thornbury 写了一本 How to Teach Vocabulary(2002年出版),同样说母语人士平均词汇量是 20,000:An educated native speaker will probably have a vocabulary of around 20,000 words (or, more accurately, 20,000 word families ...). This is the result of adding a thousand words a year to the 5,000 words he or she had acquired by the age of five.